Gå til innhold

Filmprat v2.0 - Generell diskusjon om/rundt film


LarsP

Anbefalte innlegg

Videoannonse
Annonse
Noen som har sett Fitzcarraldo, og er den verdt sine 99 spenn?

9252351[/snapback]

Jeg syns ikke filmen er god i seg selv egentlig, men heller det faktumet at det man ser i filmen skjer i virkeligheten. Båten ble virkelig dratt over fjellet bare av mennesker. Absolutt en film man bør se, men fallt ikke for den.

Lenke til kommentar
Inside Man...

9253753[/snapback]

 

...er en veldig god film, og den kan jeg trygt anbefale!

 

The Negotiator handler vel også forsåvidt om gisler, selv om det kanskje er mer om selve forhandleren.

 

(Og hvis jeg skal dra det virkelig langt kan jo nesten Assault on Precinct 13 regnes med - men de er jo ikke gisler, bare ufrivillig fanget.)

Lenke til kommentar

The Pianist er en meget bra film. Og ja, det er helt sykt det som skjedde under Nazi-Tysklands regime.

Men se Schindler's List, så får du se noen andre gode sider med mennesket. Fantastisk film! :)

 

Da var 300, Smokin' Aces og The Departed sendt fra Play.com og Deep Discount. 2 dager etter jeg bestilte dem. :hmm:

Lenke til kommentar
The Pianist er en meget bra film. Og ja, det er helt sykt det som skjedde under Nazi-Tysklands regime.

Men se Schindler's List, så får du se noen andre gode sider med mennesket. Fantastisk film! :)

 

Da var 300, Smokin' Aces og The Departed sendt fra Play.com og Deep Discount. 2 dager etter jeg bestilte dem.  :hmm:

9253944[/snapback]

 

Schindler's List er sett, for lengst siden. En fantastisk film, det og.

 

Noen andre som er like gode i samme sjanger?

Lenke til kommentar
Du har kanskje sett den, men de tre filmene jeg tenker på når jeg tenker holocaust er Schindler, Pianist og La vite è bella.

9254034[/snapback]

 

Takker for tipset.

 

Noen som har sett Citizen Kane?

 

Føyer den seg inn i rekken av kjedsomme klassikere eller er den faktisk verdt en titt?

 

Fant en morsom "anmeldelse" av Citizen Kane. :!:

 

The Worst Movie Of All Time!!

 

Klikk for å se/fjerne innholdet nedenfor

Everybody says this movie is the greatest of all time, I decided that I should watch it before I agreed, so I decided to buy the DVD. Before I had bought the DVD my favourite movie was Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers... It still is.

 

Let's start with the cinematography. The cinematography in this movie is poor when compared to something like the Terminator... or Terminator 2, which never fails to make feel emotional (but I don't cry in movies, that's for fags). The black and white colour annoyed me, if Welles was set in filming it in black and white he should have done a more Sin City sort of thing, that would have been more atmospheric (something this movie lacks compared to something like The Matrix Reloaded)

 

Next on to the acting. Orson Welles spoke of his disdain for method acting, to a certain extent when you see rubbish black and white movies like A Streetcar Named Desire and Raging Bull it's easy to sympathise with him, but Welles would have done a lot better to have cast someone like Bob Gunton who looks more like Hearst. I'd like to see someone tell me they can find a more suitable person for the role.

 

Next, the story. This is often heavily praised along with the rest of the movie. I don't see why. If Welles was serious about his stories, he would have put more fighting in it. I was annoyed to find that Rosebud didn't poison Kane, I wouldn't have guessed that sort of plot twist. It could have done with more jokes as well really, you can tell a war was going on, nobody was laughing, especially in the early scenes.

 

In short, I was disgusted by the praise lavishly put upon this picture, especially when something as brilliant as the Boondock Saints or the remake of the Hitcher get ignored. This sickens me, and my GSCE in film studies.

 

This isn't the worst movie of all time, since it had sound and wasn't in a foreign language, but it is near the worst movie of all time.

 

Case closed

 

(After reading several reviews in this vein I felt it necessary to mock them, unfortunately the users who hold similar opinions probably stopped reading as soon as they started to agree.)

 

It is being able to write this as a review and vote one star on the film based on these reasons that represent everything wrong with IMDB

Endret av Xtra
Lenke til kommentar
Du har kanskje sett den, men de tre filmene jeg tenker på når jeg tenker holocaust er Schindler, Pianist og La vite è bella.

9254034[/snapback]

 

Takker for tipset.

 

Noen som har sett Citizen Kane?

 

Føyer den seg inn i rekken av kjedsomme klassikere eller er den faktisk verdt en titt?

 

Fant en morsom "anmeldelse" av Citizen Kane. :!:

 

The Worst Movie Of All Time!!

 

Klikk for å se/fjerne innholdet nedenfor

Everybody says this movie is the greatest of all time, I decided that I should watch it before I agreed, so I decided to buy the DVD. Before I had bought the DVD my favourite movie was Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers... It still is.

 

Let's start with the cinematography. The cinematography in this movie is poor when compared to something like the Terminator... or Terminator 2, which never fails to make feel emotional (but I don't cry in movies, that's for fags). The black and white colour annoyed me, if Welles was set in filming it in black and white he should have done a more Sin City sort of thing, that would have been more atmospheric (something this movie lacks compared to something like The Matrix Reloaded)

 

Next on to the acting. Orson Welles spoke of his disdain for method acting, to a certain extent when you see rubbish black and white movies like A Streetcar Named Desire and Raging Bull it's easy to sympathise with him, but Welles would have done a lot better to have cast someone like Bob Gunton who looks more like Hearst. I'd like to see someone tell me they can find a more suitable person for the role.

 

Next, the story. This is often heavily praised along with the rest of the movie. I don't see why. If Welles was serious about his stories, he would have put more fighting in it. I was annoyed to find that Rosebud didn't poison Kane, I wouldn't have guessed that sort of plot twist. It could have done with more jokes as well really, you can tell a war was going on, nobody was laughing, especially in the early scenes.

 

In short, I was disgusted by the praise lavishly put upon this picture, especially when something as brilliant as the Boondock Saints or the remake of the Hitcher get ignored. This sickens me, and my GSCE in film studies.

 

This isn't the worst movie of all time, since it had sound and wasn't in a foreign language, but it is near the worst movie of all time.

 

Case closed

 

(After reading several reviews in this vein I felt it necessary to mock them, unfortunately the users who hold similar opinions probably stopped reading as soon as they started to agree.)

 

It is being able to write this as a review and vote one star on the film based on these reasons that represent everything wrong with IMDB

9254095[/snapback]

 

Det er en film du skjønner var et gjennombrudd i den tiden den kom, samtidig som den rett og slett er god.

 

Men de av ung alder som er filminteresserte og sier filmen er den beste i verden, sier det kunn på grunnlag av filmhistorie og ikke egenopplevd opplevelse. Med andre ord, en "uekte" stor film for oss som ikke er av den generasjonen som opplevde den da den først kom. Sånt sett så synes jeg det er noe forbanna hykleri at filmnerdene idag sier idag den er superbra på noe annet grunnlag enn historisk.

Lenke til kommentar

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
  • Hvem er aktive   0 medlemmer

    • Ingen innloggede medlemmer aktive
×
×
  • Opprett ny...