Dragavon

https://www.dagbladet.no/tema/her-er-putins-spioner-i-norge/85193331

https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/avslorer-putins-plan-skjer-pa-seks-sekunder/85155896 https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/ukraina-utvikler-nye-vapen-for-a-bekjempe-russlands-nye-jetdroner/1680672

Eg tenker at det er resultatet av Vivaldi-offensiven. Vi får nok vite meir når Ukraina er klar til å informere om kva dei oppnår.

https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-september-25-2026/

READ : For over two decades, Russian state exporters marketed the S-400 "Triumf" surface-to-air missile system as an unassailable defensive shield. Heavily promoted across the Global South as a premier anti-access system capable of detecting and destroying everything from low-altitude cruise missiles to high-speed ballistic profiles, the multi-billion-dollar platform served as the pride of Moscow’s military-industrial export portfolio. However, repeated precision strikes conducted by Ukrainian forces against active S-400 batteries deployed across occupied Crimea have dismantled that marketing narrative. By utilizing Western-supplied tactical ballistic missiles (ATACMS) alongside indigenous strike platforms, Ukraine has exposed fatal operational flaws inside Russia’s flagship air defense architecture. The Strikes: Neutralizing the Shield in Crimea The physical vulnerability of the S-400 was laid bare across multiple engagements at strategic Crimean staging hubs, including Belbek, Dzhankoi, and Olenivka. In coordinated strike packages, Ukrainian forces targeted the S-400’s primary operational components: the 92N6E engagement radar, command post vehicles, and transporter-erector-launchers (TELs). Rather than swatting away incoming ballistic threats as advertised, S-400 batteries were repeatedly caught on the receiving end. Satellite imagery confirmed the destruction of multiple 92N6E radar units (the "eyes" of the entire system,) effectively blinding local air defense coverage and leaving multimillion-dollar missile tubes burning on their launch pads. The Capability Exposed: Radar Saturation and Tracking Blind Spots For military intelligence analysts, these strikes provided crucial real-world data regarding the S-400’s technical limitations: Radar Blind Spots and Horizon Limitations: The 92N6E radar struggles to track low-altitude terrain-masking cruise missiles and steep-diving, high-velocity ballistic trajectories simultaneously. Saturation Thresholds: Ukrainian strike coordinators exploited processing limits within the S-400’s battle management system by launching high-volume, low-cost decoy swarms directly alongside primary strike effectors. Lack of Point-Defense Synergy: Despite being paired with short-range Pantsir-S1 point-defense vehicles to protect primary radars from incoming submunitions, local defensive overlays routinely failed to intercept fast-moving cluster warheads. Once the primary engagement radar is saturated or blinded by electronic warfare, the entire S-400 battery loses its combat capability, transforming a multi-billion-dollar air defense shield into a sitting target. The Allied Lesson: Swarm Dynamics for the Indo-Pacific The Pentagon and NATO allies are closely analyzing the tactical mechanics that brought down the S-400. Western strike planners have confirmed that combining digital electronic warfare masking, radar-jamming pods, and cheap, synchronized decoy launches can completely overpower advanced Russian-designed air defenses. These operational lessons are being directly incorporated into American island-hopping defense models across the Indo-Pacific. By pairing low-cost loitering munitions with long-range precision fires, coalition forces can systematically blind an adversary's primary radar network before deploying heavy strike platforms into contested airspace. Scrambling to Control the Export Damage The visible destruction of S-400 hardware has created a commercial nightmare for Russian arms exporter Rosoboronexport. Major foreign buyers (including India, Turkey, and prospective clients across the Middle East) have watched high-profile defense systems fail to protect their own launch sites from tactical ballistic missiles. Russian state media and defense representatives are actively attempting to downplay the losses. Exporters argue that destroyed batteries were either operated under improper tactical conditions, targeted by overwhelming NATO satellite reconnaissance, or caught during maintenance cycles. However, no amount of marketing spin can erase satellite imagery showing scorched S-400 radar arrays. Ukraine’s successful strikes against S-400 positions in Crimea have shattered the myth of Russia’s premier air defense shield. By demonstrating that high-tech radars can be blinded through saturation and precision fires, Ukraine has rewritten the rules of modern air defense warfare.

https://united24media.com/world/we-need-their-fear-what-russian-officials-and-state-tv-are-saying-about-war-with-europe-22864

https://www.nrk.no/artikkel/kanskje-vi-bare-skulle-kalle-det-krigforing-1528902

"feilinformert"? Blank forbanna løgn tenker eg vi seier. https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/slar-tilbake-mot-russland-etter-helikopter-drama-trakasserende/s/80-95-110705

https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/ArAd25/zelenskyj-sier-trump-har-besluttet-aa-gi-ukraina-lisens-til-aa-produsere-patriot-missiler

https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/norfund-med-milliardstotte-for-naringsliv-og-jobbskaping-i-ukraina/s/80-95-108569

https://x.com/wartranslated/status/2103391075876614325