Dragavon

Håper Ukraina sender droner med flygeblader 😁

Trump har heilt sikkert tjent milliarder på innsidehandel igjen. Og ingen i USA reagerer på at han bruker presidentrollen til å fylle sine egne lommer på ein måte ingen, ikkje ein gong putin, har gjort før.

No ser vi jo kor mykje russland betaler ham for å spre russiske løgner og forråde landet og folket sitt. Behøver ikkje å tru på løgnene når han tjener 7 mill i året på det. Men eg synest ærlig talt russland får lite igjen for pengene sine.

Tipper Pravfond 💩

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-tried-attack-russias-kirishi-oil-refinery-governor-says-2026-05-05/ https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russias-vast-kirishi-oil-refinery-halts-processing-after-drone-attack-sources-2026-05-05/ https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/russias-second-largest-oil-refinery-suspends-operations-after-ukrainian-drone-strikes-18501

Trump styrer etter innfallsmetoden. Ombestemmer seg kvart femte minutt om kven han skal krige mot. Sjokkerande, men og som forventa. Mannen er som ein femåring.

READ 💬: The strategic partnership between the United States and Germany is facing a period of intense uncertainty following a series of conflicting signals regarding the deployment of long-range missiles. In early May 2026, reports emerged that the White House had decided to scrap or at least halt the planned stationing of a long-range fires battalion in Germany. This decision, if finalized, would undo a 2024 agreement to bring Tomahawk cruise missiles and other advanced weapons to German soil to deter regional threats. A Reversal of Plans 🔻 Under an agreement reached during the previous American administration, the U.S. Army was set to begin "episodic deployments" of long-range weapons to Germany starting in 2026. These plans included the Tomahawk cruise missile, which has a range of over 1,500 miles, and the SM-6 multi-purpose missile. There was even talk of deploying the "Dark Eagle" hypersonic weapon, a high-speed missile capable of traveling five times the speed of sound. However, the current administration under President Donald Trump has signaled a shift in strategy. White House officials have cited depleted American missile stockpiles, largely due to the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Iran, as a reason for reconsidering the move. President Trump has also expressed frustration with Germany’s defense spending and its public criticism of U.S. policy toward Iran. This has led to a "rift" that many fear is impacting the core military cooperation between the two nations. Mixed Messages from Berlin and Washington 🔻 The situation has been further complicated by contradictory statements from both sides of the Atlantic. On May 3, 2026, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz appeared to confirm that the deployment was being called off. He noted in a televised interview that "objectively speaking, there is hardly any possibility" for the U.S. to relinquish such advanced systems at this time. He suggested that Europe might need to look toward its own weapons programs to fill the gap. Just 24 hours later, the German Ministry of Defense offered a more cautious view. A spokesperson stated on May 4 that there has been no "definitive cancellation" of the missile plan. The ministry insisted that the weapons were still "meant to be stationed" in Germany and could still arrive once supply issues are resolved. This back-and-forth has left military analysts and NATO allies confused about the true status of Europe’s long-range defense. The Impact of Troop Withdrawals 🔻 The confusion over missiles is happening alongside a confirmed reduction of U.S. forces in Germany. The Pentagon has officially begun the process of withdrawing 5,000 soldiers from German bases, a move that President Trump has described as a necessary rebalancing of the U.S. global footprint. For Germany, these two developments, the troop cut and the potential loss of long-range missiles, represent a significant shift in its security environment. Berlin has long viewed the presence of American "heavy" weapons as a vital shield. Without them, Germany and its European neighbors are facing a "defense gap" that they are not yet equipped to fill. While nations like France, the UK, and Germany are working on a shared European long-range missile project, those weapons are still several years away from being ready for combat. Regional Tensions and Strategic Shifts 🔻 The rift between Washington and Berlin has been worsened by a war of words over the conflict in Iran. Chancellor Merz recently criticized the U.S. handling of the war, stating that Washington was being "humiliated" by the Iranian leadership. President Trump responded sharply on social media, criticizing Merz’s effectiveness and suggesting that the U.S. might also reduce its military presence in other European countries like Italy and Spain. This political friction is now bleeding into tactical military planning. As the U.S. prepares to potentially move its newest hypersonic weapons to the Middle East instead of Europe, the "Permanent Pivot" toward other global hotspots is becoming visible. For the first time in decades, Germany is finding itself in a position where it must actively plan for a future with fewer American troops and fewer American missiles. The status of U.S. long-range missiles in Germany remains in limbo as political disagreements and supply shortages strain the transatlantic alliance. While the German government hopes the deployment is merely delayed, the White House’s focus on other conflicts suggests that Europe may need to find its own way to maintain a long-range deterrent.

Tydelig at Trump er pissesur på Zelensky fordi gulf-landene kjøper forsvar frå Ukraina mot Iranske anngrep.

https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/massivt-angrep-mot-russland/s/5-95-3019221

Pimpernell poteter, smørdampet rosenkål og baconterninger 😋🥰

Om India som inngår avtaler med Ukraina i staden for russland.

AGENT KRASNOV REPORTS: Trump, after a 90-minute phone call with Putin on April 29, 2026, released a statement on the Truth Social platform that his administration is “exploring” the possibility of a full withdrawal of American troops from Germany. This intimate 90-minute phone call with the greatest war criminal of our time and the most feared mass murderer since Hitler was not just a conversation. It was a deal. Withdrawing troops from Germany is not a “negotiation tactic.” It is a payment... This is the moment when the US president stabs NATO in the back while Putin sets Europe on fire. Trump is deliberately leaving Europe defenseless. He is sacrificing the safety of 450 million Europeans for a short, dirty one-on-one conversation with a dictator whose troops are now committing war crimes. And he does it publicly, without shame, without even trying to hide his affiliation. When this red-haired guy shouts "America first," he is deliberately lying. For him, Putin is above all. As of April 30, 2026, according to world media reports, the situation surrounding Donald Trump's statement of April 29, 2026, has caused the most acute crisis in relations within NATO in recent decades. Shock in Berlin: Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called an emergency cabinet meeting. In German political circles, Trump's statement was perceived as direct revenge for Germany's refusal to participate in the war against Iran. France and Poland have called for the immediate creation of a "European Defense Union," as the reliability of the US security umbrella is now in serious question. The Baltic states have expressed deep concern that the weakening of the American presence in Germany is a signal to Putin that the United States is ready to “surrender” Eastern Europe. The situation in Brussels and NATO headquarters as of today, April 30, 2026, is described as critical. After yesterday’s statement by President Trump and his conversation with Putin, officials and diplomats are working in emergency mode, preparing an emergency meeting of NATO. The purpose of the emergency summit: to discuss “Plan B” (the so-called “European NATO”) – a mechanism for protecting Europe without direct US participation or in the event of its withdrawal from key Alliance structures. The level of tension is incredible – in Brussels, they are already openly talking about the “existential threat” to the Alliance. The summit should be a moment of truth: will Europe be able to unite without Washington’s leadership, or will the Alliance begin to fragment into separate defense blocs. It is reported that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio may skip or limit his participation in the upcoming NATO ministerial meetings, which is an unprecedented signal - in fact a diplomatic demarche. At the same time, European leaders are shocked by Putin's proposal for a "truce on May 9" that he made to Trump. Most NATO members consider it a trap to legitimize the occupation. There are also reports of "deep disappointment" among the US military leadership, which believes that such a move destroys the deterrent system that has been built for 80 years. Trump's critics emphasize that even if the withdrawal of troops does not happen quickly, the statement itself has already caused damage. It gives Putin confidence that the unity of the West is divided and that the US is no longer a guarantee of Europe's security.