All aktivitet

Vi har vært ute i Bergenssolen i dag.🌞🌞☀️☀️

Takker for svar! Jeg forstår ikke hva GTX og RTX og Ti og XT betyr kan du forklare det?

Vi har drukket Kaffe nå.☕☕😋😋

Ok, så du etterspør en skatt man taper, men fordi man i noen tilfeller ikke taper alt av den så gjelder den ikke? Det er jo også meget sjelden at det blir kjøpt inn i spesielt tiltenkte holdingsselskaper i korrekte land/med korrekte avtaler.. Strålende logikk. "Av og til taper vi ikke all utbytteskatten når utenlandske eiere kjøper opp norske bedrifter, så det teller ikke" Ettersom Fjord1 (som jeg kom med som eksempel) er 80% eid fra Nederland, lurer på hvilket av de 4 punktene de betaler i kildeskatt.. Jeg gjetter punkt 4. Hvilket punkt tipper du?

Eske på både Ciaran & Ciara Plastposer eller Handlenett??

Det har ikke vi Vi har vært ute i solen nå.🌞🌞☀️☀️

Vi innrømmer at vi nyter Bergenssolen i dag.🌞🌞☀️☀️

Butikk kkituB

🌞🌞☀️☀️ Er det varmt hos deg i dag??

Så lenge bedrifter i EØS slipper kildeskatt, så slipper i praksis alle rike kildeskatt. De vil sette opp et irsk fond som investerer i Norge og får da unntak for norsk kildeskatt.

Mer gjetting og flere antakelser? Min antakelse var i det minste beviselig etter dine egne kilder helt korrekt. Den som søker sannheten er vis, den som mener å allerede kjenne den er en tåpe.

Vi tar patent på råtten ved.

På grunn av korstogene trodde jeg AI ville anslå et høyere antall drepte knyttet til religion. Det som gjør at jeg ikke klarer å ta deg helt seriøst, og som oppleves irriterende, er at du kommer med påstander uten tilstrekkelig faktasjekk. Det virker heller ikke som om du tar inn det andre skriver, siden svarene ofte gjentar seg med nesten samme formulering, uten nytt innhold. Jeg har nevnt dette tidligere, men da ble det vist til hersketeknikker.

Det har vi ikke Har du fryser hjemme??

Vi ønsker deg og alle sammen her i tråden, en fin og god tirsdag.❤️❤️

READ 💬: Ukraine has introduced a clever new way to protect its skies by turning a Soviet-era transport plane into a flying base for drone-hunting missions. The aircraft, a twin-engine turboprop called the An-28, is now being used to carry and launch interceptor drones directly from the air. This new method has already moved from the testing phase into real-world combat, proving effective at taking down Russian attack drones. The An-28 was originally designed decades ago for simple tasks like carrying passengers or cargo in remote areas. It is a sturdy, reliable plane that can take off from short, bumpy dirt runways rather than polished airport strips. While it is not a fast fighter jet, its ability to fly slowly and stay in the air for a long time makes it the perfect platform for hunting the slow-moving "Shahed" drones that regularly target Ukrainian cities. From Machine Guns to Mini-Missiles 🔻 Earlier in the conflict, crews on these An-28 planes were seen using a more manual approach to drone hunting. They mounted a six-barrel machine gun, known as a Minigun, in the side door to shoot at targets they spotted in the sky. While this worked, it required the pilot to fly very close to the enemy drone, which can be dangerous and difficult, especially at night. The new upgrade changes everything. Instead of relying only on guns, the plane now has specialized racks, called pylons, attached under its wings. These racks can carry up to six interceptor drones at a time. When the crew detects an enemy target using the plane's new optical sensors, they can release one of these small drones to finish the job. How the Interceptors Work 🔻 The plane uses two main types of drones for these missions. One is a Ukrainian-made model called the P1-Sun, and the other is an American-made system called Merops. These interceptors act like very cheap, smart air-to-air missiles. Once the interceptor is dropped from the wing, its own motors kick in. A pilot on the plane or on the ground then guides it toward the target using a live camera feed. This allows the interceptor to chase down the enemy drone and destroy it by crashing into it or exploding nearby. Because the interceptors are launched from the air rather than the ground, they start with the advantage of height and speed, making it much easier for them to catch their prey. A Cost-Effective Solution 🔻 One of the biggest challenges in modern defense is the cost of weapons. A single high-tech missile used by a standard air defense system can cost millions of dollars. In contrast, the drones being sent to attack Ukraine often cost only a few thousand dollars. Using expensive missiles to shoot down cheap drones is not sustainable in a long-term conflict. The An-28 and its "mini-missile" drones solve this problem. The planes are inexpensive to operate, and the interceptor drones are far cheaper than traditional missiles. By using these converted transport planes, Ukraine can save its most advanced and expensive defense systems for larger threats like cruise missiles and enemy jets. Expanding the Fleet 🔻 Reports suggest that the crews operating these "drone-hunting" planes often include civilian volunteers who have joined the military effort. This shows how quickly Ukraine is adapting its existing resources to meet new threats. With at least three mounting points on each wing, a single An-28 can now take out several targets in a single flight. The success of the An-28 program has also led to other experiments. Similar interceptor drones are now being tested for launch from uncrewed boats at sea. This "flying battery" concept marks a significant shift in how modern wars are fought, moving away from heavy, expensive machinery toward agile, low-cost technology. Ukraine’s use of the An-28 to launch interceptor drones is a practical and effective way to defend its airspace. By combining old aircraft with new drone technology, the military has created a low-cost solution to a complex modern problem.

Vi ønsker dere alle sammen her i tråden, en god og fin tirsdag.❤️❤️

Som sagt, dette med utbytte og skatt er avhengig av avtalen. EØS som du selv refererer til er en avtale. Men den generelle regelen er at det trekkes kildeskatt. Så er det opp til avtalen hvordan det blir til slutt.

Generelt begrep: Smør, Undergruppe: Kviteseidsmør Men man sier/skriver ikke Kviteseidsmør smør for det. (Kjepphest.)

75192 er nede på havnen og vi har middag klar.😋😋

Ja, det mener jeg. For i innlegget du siterer nevner jeg spesifikt dette for deg: Altså hadde jeg lest at du snakket om utbytteskatt og eksplisitt sagt dette til deg i det samme innlegget som du mener jeg ikke har lest det.

Nå hører vi to på: Please Mister Postman - The Beatles.❤️❤️❤️❤️

Navn