Gå til innhold

Ye Olde Pub (The English Pub)


Lidskjalv

Anbefalte innlegg

Videoannonse
Annonse

Amen to that, brother!

I still struggle to be consistent with either writing British English or American English, but somehow I do change between them - and it's not getting easier when I try to speak American English when I'm in the U.S., and British English when I'm in Great Britain.

I do try to write American English, but sometimes when words are pronounced alike, but written slightly different, like traveling and travelling, I do get confused and have to stop and think for a moment.

Guess I just need to be more consistent.

Endret av Henrik C
Lenke til kommentar

As a student of English I would recommend you to use one of the two, it makes it more simple, seeing you don't have to concentrate on two different spellings. A lot of Norwegians make this mistake, and actually, it doesn't really increase one's understanding of English, it will probably just confuse you. Then again, it's important to study the differences of the two varieties of written English of course, but be consistent. As a soon-to-be teacher of English, I would very much prefer my students to choose, it would make it easier for both the student and the teacher.

 

There are lot of differences, subway and underground are just two examples. Here are more examples:

 

British English: BrE

American English: AmE

 

Autumn (BrE) Fall (AmE)

Trousers (BrE ) Pants (AmE)

Pavement (BrE) Sidewalk (AmE)

Tap (BrE) Faucet (AmE)

Film (BrE) Movie (AmE)

Petrol (BrE) Gas (AmE)

Paraffin (BrE) Kerosene (AmE)

Gramophone (BrE) Phonograph (AmE)

Aluminium (BrE) Aluminum (AmE)

Endret av yvonne2
Lenke til kommentar

I'm still struggling between the two of them and I often mix the British kind with the American kind. It's not making it any easier by the fact that I read from both American authors (Stephen King) and English Authors (Tolkien or Rowling).

 

Sometimes I just have to stop, read what I've written and make sure that it's consistence to one of the two rule setts, but I can't help sometimes writing both of them in the same sentence.

 

Agree with Slimda, it should have been introduced in the education about the differences between the two of them, especially considering the influence young people have today of the two of them both through the internett but through films and games.

Lenke til kommentar

In my opinion the music isn't the same as it used to be, but then again I'm of the old type still listening to Dire Straits, Eagles, Pink Floyd and Queen.

 

I just simply can't stand much of the music of today, it's all to much un-original computer made - in my opinion - crap than what I call music.

 

And metal, sorry metal fans but I think all you hear is "GARGH YABBABABA GOGOGO BABGIGIG!", or if you prefer it in words an incoherent mess of words screech out to make the impression of rhythm :)

Endret av Bear^
Lenke til kommentar
And metal, sorry metal fans but I think all you hear is "GARGH YABBABABA GOGOGO BABGIGIG!", or if you prefer it in words an incoherent mess of words screech out to make the impression of rhythm :)

 

If you can't hear what they say in certain 'metal' songs, then it's probably not metal at all, with the exception of a few bands. Let me just point out that contrary to popular belief - screamo/emo/deathcore/metalcore or what not is not metal nor will it ever be. Sadly, this has become what the public sees as real metal, and will undoubtably be pushed away from it or towards it. Either one is equally bad in my opinion. Let me point out a crown-example of what just isn't metal at all:

 

 

It's not. :)

Endret av Mr.Graves
Lenke til kommentar

Yes, screeching is what I see as today's "metal", however, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't both Aerosmith, Guns N' Roses and Metalica seen as "metal" bands? If they are then I can agree that at least some metal is good for your ears. If not I'm afraid I have to judge by the screeching sample I've heard until now :)

Lenke til kommentar
Yes, screeching is what I see as today's "metal", however, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't both Aerosmith, Guns N' Roses and Metalica seen as "metal" bands? If they are then I can agree that at least some metal is good for your ears.

 

Yep, they're metal-bands (not sure about Aerosmith on the other hand. Sounds more like hard-rock or something of that kind). They fall under the genre of classical metal I think.

Lenke til kommentar

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
  • Hvem er aktive   0 medlemmer

    • Ingen innloggede medlemmer aktive
×
×
  • Opprett ny...