jallajall

Tror det var FT som meldte det, gjenngitt av bl.a. Pravda. One Ukrainian artillery brigade commander in Ukraine’s east told the Financial Times that part of the reason for the Russian advance was Kyiv moving its scarce resources north. His troops were back to rationing shells for their canons – the first time since US aid to Ukraine was held up by Congress – because ammunition had been reallocated for the incursion into Russia’s Kursk Oblast.

Tror du det hjelper? Det er CBS, ABC og NBC vi snakker om her.

Fant du noe feil i artikkelen?

‘Unprecedented’ positive media for Harris, 89% negative for Trump Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative). a separate count shows those statements have also favored Harris by a whopping margin (94% positive, vs. just 43% positive for Trump). At the same time, the network coverage has virtually eliminated any discussion of the strident left-wing positions Harris took as Senator or during her 2020 presidential campaign. And while Republican Vice Presidential candidate J.D. Vance and his Democratic counterpart, Tim Walz, have received nearly equal amounts of airtime, the networks have celebrated Walz (62% positive press) and punished Vance (92% negative). In 2020, we calculated that the networks supplied Joe Biden with 66% positive coverage during the general election, while the Democrats’ 2016 nominee, Hillary Clinton, actually received mostly (79%) negative coverage during that year’s campaign. Using similar methodology, Stephen Farnsworth and Robert Lichter in 2008 (scroll to page 14) found 68% positive press for Democratic nominee Barack Obama, “the highest...recorded for any nominee over the past six election cycles” by the nonpartisan Center for Media and Public Affairs. Given the networks’ idolatrous coverage of the past four weeks, it is conceivable Harris’s 2024 coverage could wind up even more positive than Obama’s was sixteen years ago.

They Truly See Their Corruption as Heroism ..We are seeing this unfold with terrible consequence as the dominant media betrays the very foundations of journalism – starting with demanding that only certain leaders answer questions – to transforming Kamala Harris into a combination of Rosa Parks, Franklin Roosevelt, and Beyoncé. Their partisanship is so manifold and manifest that it has created a cottage industry in conservative media, which creates terabytes of content each day exposing the false narratives and double standards advanced by Democrats and their laptop lackeys. Such debunking is necessary and important. But there’s a bit of delusion at work here, too: Despite all evidence to the contrary the critics somehow believe their fact-checking and truth-telling will pressure the propagandists into changing their ways. The answer is obvious: They sincerely believe that Donald Trump is an existential threat to democracy, an American Hitler. If that’s the case, why would you give him a fair shake or hold his opponents’ feet to the fire? Displaying textbook symptoms of the addled, they insist that falsehoods are truths. Despite unimpeachable evidence to the contrary, they continue to maintain that Trump conspired with Vladimir Putin to steal the 2016 election, that he called all Mexicans rapists, praised neo-Nazi marchers at Charlottesville, advised Americans to inject bleach to combat COVID, and promised a “bloodbath” if he loses in November. They are not lying when they make these claims – they sincerely believe they are expressing truths the rest of us just can’t see. This makes them immune to reason.

Michigan disqualifies presidential candidate Cornel West from November ballot Jonathan Brater, Michigan's elections director, wrote the West campaign a letter dated Friday saying that the affidavits of identity submitted to the Secretary of State's Office in June for West and his vice presidential running mate, Melina Abdullah, were not properly notarized. Brater's letter, which gave West five days to provide evidence to rebut the disqualification, said the West campaign was informed on July 26 about a challenge to the affidavits brought by former Michigan Democratic Party Chairman Mark Brewer and given until Aug. 2 to respond. Jeg tror ikke amerikanerne skjønner hvor heldige de er som har demokratene som passer på at færrest mulige slipper til på valglistene slik at borgerne bare har to kandidater å velge mellom og slipper å sette seg inn i alle andre kandidaters agenda.

De fikk jo en bra anerkjennelse i dag da. Og DNC skryter jo også av det Biden har gjort. Men hvis det ikke er noe Kamala har tenkt å ta tak i, så er det vel sånn det er da.

Sikkert fordi det ble et tema i dag ifbm DNC plattformen som ble lansert? Men kanskje det ikke er noe Kamala brenner for lenger..?!

Hva mener hun?

Ja, White House under Biden fikk også fjernet parodikontoer av medlemmer i Biden-familien. De fikk også f.eks. fjernet denne videoen med Jill Biden. Twitter nektet først, men White House kranglet på det, og Twitter slettet den noen dager senere.

Hva med å rapportere trolling til moderator i stedet for å fylle opp tråden med trollanklager? Sjekk denne, denne eller denne.

Oppfordring til vold er ikke dekket av ytringsfrihet.

Harris’s Early Campaign: Heavy on Buzz, Light on Policy When Hillary Clinton ran for president in 2016, she had more than 200 distinct policy proposals. Four years ago, Joseph R. Biden Jr. had a task force write a 110-page policy document for his White House bid. Now, Vice President Kamala Harris does not have a policy page on her campaign website.

Jeg vet hva Elon mener med det. Samtidig er det slik at ganske mange faktisk ikke helt vet hva "free speech" er og desto enda flere virker å ikke helt forstå hva hva "free speech absolutist" innebærer og hvertfall ikke hva Elon legger i det. Når du skriver "free speech absolutist", mener du da det Elon mener eller har du din egen definisjon på hva dette er? Hvis du mener spørsmålet er meningsløst, hvorfor sier du ikke det med en gang? Hvorfor velger du heller å svare noe helt urelevant i stedet for bare å hoppe over det eller påpeke at spørsmålet er meningsløst..? Påstanden jeg kom med var ganske enkel; Jeg sa at Twitter bare skjuler innholdet i det aktuelle landet, mens YT/Meta sletter det helt (globalt). Dette kan du lett verifisere selv ved å prøve å gå inn på noen av YT/Meta lenkene som finnes i rettsordrene de har fått tilsendt. Så postet jeg et dokument som inneholder noen slike linker, slik at du selv kan prøve å gå inn på de å sjekke. At du mener at dette er "tomme påstander" eller "fullstendig uten kontekst" får jo litt til å undres over hva som gjør påstandene tomme eller hva slags kontekts du mener ville være relevant?

Men hvorfor svarer du egentlig ikke på det jeg spør om? Og hvorfor velger du i hele tatt å svare med noe helt annet? Jeg har backet opp påstandene jeg kom med. Jeg sa at forskjellen mellom Twitter og YT/Meta var at Twitter bare skjuler i det aktuelle landet, mens YT/Meta sletter de globalt og jeg sa det er bare å prøve å gå inn på noen av YT/Meta linkene å prøve selv. Hva mener du jeg ikke har dokumentert?

Hva mener Kamala?

Å krysse grensen er i utgangspunktet bare en misdemeanor som resulterer i bøter eller fengsel i inntil 6 mnd. Det er en haug misdemeanors som bare resulterer i "civil penalty", for eksempel småtyveri eller shoplifting, men at straffen bare er en "civil penalty" er i seg selv alene ikke avgjørende for hvorvidt det er en crime eller ei. I noen tilfeller, f.eks. hvor man har vært delaktig i noe som er en felony, men velger å tyste, så vil straffereaksjonen for vedkommende kun være civil penalties. Hadde ikke unlawful entry vært en "crime" ville det heller ikke vært mulig å tiltale en person i retten.. Men det er jo. En som tar seg over gresen kan straffes med inntil 6 mnders fengsel. Crimes are ranked as greater violations of public order (felony) or as lesser violations (misdemeanor), and are adjudicated according to rules of criminal procedure. Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) has repeatedly declared, “An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.” When asked if she meant everyone here illegally, both those who entered illegally and those who have remained illegally, she replied, “Two obvious points. It is a civil violation, it’s not a crime. Period, full stop. And the second point is that there is a whole community that is being vilified because of this misinformed, misdirected term ’illegal alien’ … It’s actually ignorant and we can’t afford to run our country that way. So they are not criminals.” Illegal entry into the United States has been prosecuted as a criminal matter for decades, though the percentage of cases handled criminally versus civilly has fluctuated with different administrations. Indeed, if it were true that illegal entry was not a crime, the entire Trump administration enforcement program, and thousands of such cases under President Obama, would have been struck down.. In fact, the government can charge illegal entry, even for first offenders, as a crime under 18 U.S.C. 3559 with up to six months imprisonment.

Dette er noe Harris ikke bare har sagt en gang i 2015, men noe hun har sagt utallige ganger. Det er en helt vanlig statement å høre fra demokrater. Neida hun sa det ikke ordrett slik det står i teksten, men det er likevel den logiske følgen av det. "Undocumentet immigrants" er betegnelsen på "individuals who have either illegally entered the United States without inspection.." som er er straffbart; 8 U.S.C. 1325 sets forth criminal offenses relating to (1) improper entry into the United States by an alien.. Når man da hevder det ikke er en crime å være en undocumentet immigrant (noe det jo per definisjon er), så betyr det rent logisk at man må fjerne forholdet som gjør det straffbart (å ta seg inn i landet ulovlig). En som driver med ulovlig ned/opplasting av filmer o.l. kalles gjerne for "pirat". Hvis noen sier det er ikke kriminelt å være pirat, hva tror du de impliserer?

Det var ikke det jeg spurte om. For eksempel denne.

Ikke alle demokrater og independents er like godt kjent med Kamala.

Hva er det å være "free speech absolutist"? Twitter har ved noen anledninger postet rettsorderne de har fått tilsendt, der finnes også flere Facebook og Youtube linker. Det er bare å prøve å gå inn på noen av de.

Bernie Sanders er kanskje ikke den første personen jeg tenker på hva gjelder gjester hos Theo Von, men bra å se. While reflecting on his own bids for the Democratic presidential ticket, Sanders was asked if he believes the election process in the U.S. “is still Democratic,” to which he replied, “Yes and no.” “I mean, you want to run for office, can you? Yup, you can,” Sanders said. “You’ve got to have a certain number of signatures. But if you’re going to win, and I have 10 times more money than you do, I will beat you 95% of the time.” “Maybe if you’re really an exceptional candidate and I’m a real idiot, you will beat me once in a while. But by and large, money people will win. So if you’re asking me, are we a democracy, in one sense, we are,” he continued. But money, he said, is the “real power.”

Tror nok det finnes flere andre og bedre tiltak enn at staten skal sette et tak på max fortjeneste på grandisen eller kobebiffen.. og hvorfor akkuratt matvarer og ikke olabukser eller bredbåndsregningen. En liten lokal sjappe som handler fra lokale leverandører må ofte ta helt annen fortjenste og priser på produktene enn store kjeder. Da er det nok heller bedre å f.eks redusere momsen på sunne matvarer eller lignende.

The Radical Protesters Who Plan to ‘Shut Down the DNC for Gaza’ The specter of 1968 haunts this year’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Protests turned into riots outside the DNC there 56 years ago, and footage calls to mind this year’s anti-Israel mobs. “Whether it’s Genocide Joe, or Killer Kamala, the butchers of Gaza cannot be allowed to gather in Chicago undisturbed,” the self-described anti-imperialist organization Behind Enemy Lines proclaimed in an Instagram post last month. It called for protesters to “make it great like ’68” and to “shut down the DNC for Gaza!” The group is coordinating with Palestine Action US, which encourages vandalism and other unlawful acts, and Samidoun, the “Palestinian prisoner solidarity network,” which cheered Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre. Let's riot!

Flashback til da jeg også kalte Zerohedge for anerkjent og verdensledende nyhetsmagasin. Da var det faktisk noen som skjønte det. Men ikke nå. Du har helt rett, jeg aner ikke hvem Alex Jones er, har aldri hørt navnet før.