jallajall

Hvorfor er det tvilsomt? I henhold til loven altså. En forening i seg selv tar neppe noen konkret, ekte skade av bygget, derfor ser man på noen av dets medlemmer ville fått en slik skade og kunne gått til søksmål på egenhånd - det er her Hoagland kommer inn. Om du synes flertallet er fleksibel i sine lovtolkninger, så er vel kanskje også mindretallet v/Roberts noe fleksibel i sine tolkninger? Kjennelsen handler om skader som følge av estetiske og arkitekturiske betraktninger, dette er jo i stor grad subjektive vurderinger. Som Jontahan Turley kommenterer, så blir allerede slike saker ofte forkastet i retten. I teach aesthetic nuisance cases where courts tend to reject claims of injury due to eyesores and blight. Such claims are disfavored in both codes and cases. Hvor mange saker det faktisk er hvor saksøker oppfyller hjemmelen aner jeg ikke, men det er forhåpentligvis ikke for mange.

Dersom man ikke har hjemmel til å saksøke, så får man heller ikke tatt saken sin opp for retten - uansett hvor bra sak eller argumenter man egentlig har. At hva er feigt? Hvem? Usignerte avjørelser er helt vanlig.

Det er faktisk ganske strenge krav for hvem hva hvor som kan ta en sak til retten; ..a litigant must have standing in order to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court so that the court may exercise its “remedial powers on his behalf.” In general, for a party to establish Article III standing, he must allege (and ultimately prove) that he has a genuine stake in the outcome of the case because he has personally suffered (or will imminently suffer): (1) a concrete and particularized injury (The harm must be real, specific to the person (particularized), and actual or about to happen immediately (imminent)) (2) that is traceable to the allegedly unlawful actions of the opposing party (The defendant caused the injury) (3) that is redressable by a favorable judicial decision (A court victory will fix the harm) Det er ikke bare fritt frem for hvilken som helst tredje part å saksøke, skaden saksøker påføres må være ekte og eksistere i den virkelige verden. At lovligheten delvis er behandlet i de lavere rettsinstansene betyr egentlig ikke så mye dersom SCOTUS likevel kommer frem til at saksøker ikke har Artikkel III hjemmel. SCOTUS har jo bare omgjort/forkastet distriktrettens midlertidige forføyning, de kan fortsatt ta saken til behandling i sin helhet når den tid kommer, dersom retten plutselig finner at saksøker har hjemmel likevel..

I hvilken grad Trump respekterte den midlertidige forføyningen er jo ikke spesielt relevant for om de hadde hjemmel til å få hørt saken basert på denne damens estetiske sans og de skader et stygt bygg måtte påføre henne. Lovligheten i seg selv rundt byggeprosjektet har ingen betydning på om National Trust har hjemmel til å få hørt saken sin for retten. Det er nok ganske mange foreninger og interesseorganisasjoner der ute som drømmer om å kunne ta saker til retten selv om de verken er part eller har hjemmel til det.. Åpner man for noen, åpner man for andre. «Perhaps nearly any government action or project offends someone’s sensibilities.» Lovlighetsspørsmålet kan jo helt behandles av SCOTUS det også om spørsmålet føres for de og får argumenter for og mot, men blir jo kanskje litt ullent å behandle en sak fra noen som ikke har hjemmel til å få hørt saken sin.. Kan fort føre til mye rart, typ en flom av NRAA søksmål hvor de egentlig ikke har rett å ført saken for retten, men retten likevel konkluderer i flere av sakene. :]

Selv om de ikke har hjemmel til å få hørt saken i rettssapparatet? Hvilke kriterier er det da som skal avgjøre om man skal få prøvd saken sin? Det ble utstedet en midlertidig forføyning som satte arbeidet over bakken på hold, det er denne anken som scotus har behandlet.

EN av National Trust's medlemmer bor i DC og hun liker ikke estetikken og arkitekturen som hun mener hun vil ta skade av å måtte se en gang i månden når hun går forbi der. Dette var nok til å få hele prosjektet stanset. To secure standing to sue in federal court consistent with Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff must establish that it has suffered an “injury in fact”—that is, the “invasion of a legally protected interest.” To establish its standing to bring this case, the Trust relies on a declaration from a single of its members, Alison K. Hoagland. Hoagland says that she lives in Washington, D. C., and expects to visit the neighborhood around the White House “about once a month.” She asserts that having to view the finished ballroom the government is constructing would cause her to suffer “injuries” to her “aesthetic, cultural, and historical interests” because she finds the “scale,” “height,” and “massing” of the government’s design distasteful. On the strength of that declaration, the Trust contends, it has Article III standing to challenge the East Wing project. This Court has not found standing in circumstances like these before. To the contrary, we have repeatedly held that mere offense" does not count. Galskap.

Et russisk angrep på NATO et bare noen timer unna.

Hello.

Interessant å se hvordan (utenlandske) selskaper tar kontrollen over jordbruket i Ukraina, takket være bl.a. IMF. Betting the Farm At first, land sales were restricted to individual Ukrainian citizens who could only transfer small plots; beginning in 2024 corporations were allowed to purchase land too, up to ten thousand hectares. Today, large agroholdings control around a quarter of Ukraine’s arable land, the largest of which are all registered overseas in tax havens like Cyprus and Luxembourg. Agroprosperis, the fourth-largest landholder in Ukraine at nearly three hundred thousand hectares, is owned outright by American investment firm NCH Capital.

US has paused Estonia's ammunition supplies until end of Iran conflict, says minister Estonia's Minister of Defense Hanno Pevkur on Monday said the U.S. has paused Estonia's deliveries until the end of the war in Iran, at least. If the conflict lasts for a long time, Estonia may start to reconsider its previous decisions about weapons purchases, he added. Pevkur said the main issues for Estonia are related to HIMARS ammunition and Javelins. He said there are "no problems" with anti-tank ammunition as the country has "sufficient quantities." "In the case of HIMARS, it rather depends on how long the deliveries remain on hold. That will also determine what our further decisions will be," the minister said.

Tror en russisk kollaps vil være verst tenkelig utfall for Kina.

Litt fryktporno på formiddagen. Russland kan angripe Europa, ikke på grunn av Ukraina eller fordi de vil gå til krig med NATO, men fordi Kina spør om det. Are you not afraid yet? Oh, you will be. You will be. Moscow could launch attack on European state on China's orders - ex-NATO advisor "I believe in this [that Russia could attack a European country], but it is not related to Ukraine," he said. "It is related to China. So, the scenario that deeply worries NATO is that China is forging ties with Russia to attack Taiwan, because if Russia attacked a European country, if that happens, the U.S. would have to choose and fight on two fronts. One front is Europe, and the other is in the Asia-Pacific region. This is the scenario now being considered, and it causes concern for NATO. And since Russia is increasingly becoming a Chinese satellite, it will likely have to do it. I think this is a very alarming scenario."

UK har visst kke råd til å ta affære mot sanksjonerte skip. Money worries blocking navy from boarding Russian tankers The Royal Navy has not seized any sanctioned Russian oil tankers because of concerns in Whitehall that the cost of berthing and maintaining the vessels could reach tens of millions of pounds. Sir Keir Starmer pledged last month to “go after” Russian tankers flying false flags. Under his plans the vessels can be boarded by special forces and officers from the National Crime Agency. However, no operations have taken place due to a dispute in government over where the vessels should be held and which department will pay for them. The Department for Transport has been accused of “dragging its feet”. Earlier this month a shadow fleet tanker was escorted through the English Channel by a Russian frigate. Three more sanctioned tankers sailed through the next day. Russia’s shadow fleet consists of about 700 vessels, carrying about 40 per cent of all Russian oil exports. The UK has sanctioned 544 Russian shadow fleet vessels to date. Some Russian oil tankers appeared to be steering clear of the English Channel after Starmer’s initial announcement in March. Four ships flying false flags changed their course and two others performed U-turns before transiting through the Channel on March 26.

Irland er fysen på å kaste ut ukrainere. ‘Generous’ package to encourage Ukrainians to go home Colm Brophy, the Fine Gael minister of state for migration, said the government would move to terminate the remaining contracts under which about 16,000 Ukrain­ians were accommodated. “They will be having to leave because we will be ending the ­contracts. And the timeline is the critical thing here. We have a clear direction. I want to see that ­timeline be something we conclude in the next 12 months. We have to finalise that as a decision of government.” He said officials were working on a returns policy, to coincide with the end of the directive, which would ask Ukrainians to return home and offer them financial supports to do so. At present, asylum seekers can apply for up to €2,500 for an individual or up to €10,000 per family to return to their country of origin.

Omtrent som forventet ser man russerne igjen begynner å ty til angrep med og støttet av panserede kjøretøy.

Akkurat som immigranter bygget USA, skal nå immigranter bygge Ukraina.

Jaja.. India nevnes. Sikkert en del andre asiatiske land også. De har vel hatt sine daglige artikler de også med mennesker som får SJOKK når de ser pumpeprisen stiger med noen prosent.

På tide å dra hjem å forsvare landet ditt, sier Merz til ukrainske menn. Merz said that it is time for Ukrainian men in Germany to go home German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, during a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, stated that Germany will limit the number of Ukrainian men seeking asylum in the country and will facilitate their return home. “We will work closely (with Ukraine – ed.) when it comes on Ukrainian citizens who have sought refuge in our country and will make it easier for them to return home,” he said. Merz added that Berlin and Kyiv will cooperate to limit the number of Ukrainian men seeking asylum in Germany. “It is crucial that these men are there to help their country,” the German chancellor said. This decision is motivated by the need for human resources to defend Ukraine amid the ongoing aggression by the Russian Federation.

Andriy Yermak, som tidligere nærmest bestemte alt fra sjakkpresident og fotballtrener for landslaget til ministre, har fortsatt makt selv om han måtte gå av og ble erstatte av Budanov. Zelenskyy's former top aide Yermak has retained influence despite stepping down – sources Sources in political and business circles have told Ukrainska Pravda that Yermak still maintains control over most appointees at the Office and has full awareness of what is going on. "One signal from the president and everyone would stop taking calls from Yermak," a UP source in political circles said. "But that signal never came. On the contrary, there is a signal confirming Andrii's authority." Another source within the government said Yermak's influence has not gone anywhere – it's just become less public: "Yermak's not here, yet he is here" was how the source put it. Sources also noted that a number of key government figures have retained their positions, and Yermak's influence continues to be felt in terms of personnel decisions. One experienced politician remarked ironically that it is impossible to "gain access to any brigades or enter the Bar Association" without the president's approval. "We thought Yermak was the problem, so we fought Yermak – but it was the president," a senior member of Zelenskyy's team told Ukrainska Pravda journalist Mykhailo Tkach off the record two months after Yermak's resignation. Some sources said, however, that it has been "easier to breathe" and access to leadership has improved since the recent changes at the Office.

Druzhba er visst reparert allerede neste uke, sier Magyar.

Tok ikke mer enn et par dager før Magyar inviterte Netanyahu til Ungarn. Han har også sagt at de bare vil imøtekomme 4 (hmm?) av EU's 27 krav, da han mener resten er et angrep på Ungarns suverenitet. Skal også stramme enda hardere inn på grensen mot sør, vil prioritere å få Druzhba rørledningen gjenåpnet (han har vel tidligere vært ute og sagt at ser for seg å fase ut russisk energi i løpet av 10 år) og støtter heller ikke et "hurtig" EU medlemsskap for Ukraina (vet egentlig ikke om det er noen som støtter det, though), kommer dog ikke til å motsette seg EU støtte til de.

“There is no limit to human stupidity”: Budanov spoke sharply about evaders and mobilization “Look. That's why I was talking about unity today at this meeting. Because, above all, there is no limit to human stupidity and will never be. Second, there are real problems. Problems, let’s say, are mental in our society. Because, on the one hand, everyone says that it is necessary to fight to victory. And, on the other hand, everyone is fleeing from mobilization. And it all happens at the same time. This is a huge problem,” said Budanov. ..He noted that in the 12 years of the war and 4 years of full-scale invasion there was a gap between the reluctance of citizens to fight and the need to support the front. Mange unnasluntrere. Polls har vist en liten nedgang i oppslutningen for "fight to victory", men er nok alltid enklere å svare på en poll enn å faktisk frivillig bidra til å realisere resultatet selv.

Dette er et regime som dreper demonstranter som de er skadedyr, henger homofile, bestemmer hvordan kvinner skal kle seg, bruker amputasjon son straff, tillater barne ektekskap, bruker tortur, etc. - men dere er altså opprørt over at Trump kaller de for dyr?

Hva er egentlig forskjellen mellom dette og det Newson pushet da han også ønsket å kriminalisere hjemløshet? Og det er vel kriminelt å være hjemløs i Norege og Oslo også. Hjerterått! "Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing cities and counties to ban homeless"

Det har vært mye oppstyr og fuzz rundt Skala regimentet 425th de siste dagene etter ytre-høyre personlighet Sternenko langet ut mot de etter et mislykket mekanisert angrep. Skala svarte bl.a. ved å invitere Sternenko en tur til fronten. KyivIndependent har tatt for seg saken. Skelia's tactics in this attack, Sternenko said, were just the latest example of a systemically wasteful approach to offensive operations in the unit — among other assault regiments — that leads to excess Ukrainian personnel losses, often for little to no tangible gains. "Treating our people like this is a crime, and there must be accountability for this" Skala har lenge hatt et lugubert rykte, men det er heller ikke den eneste problemet de har. In practice however, Skelia, along with many of the other units inside Ukraine's Assault Forces, are well-known to answer directly to Syrskyi, who himself has been notorious for an appetite for assaults, and micromanaging combat operations down to the tactical level. "What questions can there really be to the unit commander, if Syrskyi personally commands at the command posts of regiments and corps?" Bohdan Krotevych, ex-Chief of Staff of Ukraine's legendary Azov Brigade, and a frequent critic of the Commander-in-Chief, said in a post on social media on April 1. "He (Syrskyi) personally approves assault operations, personally distributes the majority of mobilized people to his favorite units, completely ignoring the order of the President of Ukraine regarding fair distribution."