Gå til innhold
Trenger du hjelp med internett og nettverk? Still spørsmål her ×

går 802.11b og 802.11g sammen?


Anbefalte innlegg

Videoannonse
Annonse

EDIT:

Ooops! Jeg tenkte på a og g, de sender på forskjellige frekvenser... Det værste er at jeg sitter med "Computer Networking" ved siden av meg. Uff dette var flaut! :blush:

 

802.11

In 1997, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) created the first WLAN standard. They called it 802.11 after the name of the group formed to oversee its development. Unfortunately, 802.11 only supported a maximum bandwidth of 2 Mbps - too slow for most applications. For this reason, ordinary 802.11 wireless products are no longer being manufactured.

802.11b

IEEE expanded on the original 802.11 standard in July 1999, creating the 802.11b specification. 802.11b supports bandwidth up to 11 Mbps, comparable to traditional Ethernet.

802.11b uses the same radio signaling frequency - 2.4 GHz - as the original 802.11 standard. Being an unregulated frequency, 802.11b gear can incur interference from microwave ovens, cordless phones, and other appliances using the same 2.4 GHz range. However, by installing 802.11b gear a reasonable distance from other appliances, interference can easily be avoided. Vendors often prefer using unregulated frequencies to lower their production costs.

 

Pros of 802.11b - lowest cost; signal range is best and is not easily obstructed

Cons of 802.11b - slowest maximum speed; supports fewer simultaneous users; appliances may interfere on the unregulated frequency band

802.11a

When 802.11b was developed, IEEE created a second extension to the original 802.11 standard called 802.11a. Because 802.11b gained in popularity much faster than did 802.11a, some folks believe that 802.11a was created after 802.11b. In fact, 802.11a was created at the same time. Due to its higher cost, 802.11a fits predominately in the business market, whereas 802.11b better serves the home market.

802.11a supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps and signals in a regulated 5 GHz range. Compared to 802.11b, this higher frequency limits the range of 802.11a. The higher frequency also means 802.11a signals have more difficulty penetrating walls and other obstructions. Because 802.11a and 802.11b utilize different frequencies, the two technologies are incompatible with each other. Some vendors offer hybrid 802.11a/b network gear, but these products simply implement the two standards side by side.

 

Pros of 802.11a - fastest maximum speed; supports more simulatenous users; regulated frequencies prevent signal interference from other devices

Cons of 802.11a - highest cost; shorter range signal that is more easily obstructed

802.11g

In 2002 and 2003, WLAN products supporting a new standard called 802.11g began to appear on the scene. 802.11g attempts to combine the best of both 802.11a and 802.11g. 802.11g supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps, and it uses the 2.4 Ghz frequency for greater range. 802.11g is backwards compatible with 802.11b, meaning that 802.11g access points will work with 802.11b wireless network adapters and vice versa.

Pros of 802.11g - fastest maximum speed; supports more simulatenous users; signal range is best and is not easily obstructed

Cons of 802.11g - costs more than 802.11b; appliances may interfere on the unregulated signal frequency

 

Det funker fint med b og g sammen!

 

EDIT2: Jeg skal ha eksamen i datateknikk - datakommunikasjon imorgen. Med mitt første innlegg så lover det vel ikke så bra nei!

Endret av schmelck
Lenke til kommentar

b og g er kompatible og dei går på same frekvens 2.4 Ghz

Dei fleste produkt som er b spesifisert skal kunne tilknyttast g-kort og visa versa.

 

Det som kan skape problemer er viss eing routeren/aksesspunktet er låst til 54mbit (g-hastigheit), trur eg at b-kort kan få problem.

 

a dreimot her ikkje kompatibel med verke b eller g sidan denne opererer i 5Ghz båndet

 

Det med fartnedsettninga på g-einehiter ved tilkobling av b-einheiter gjelder i dei fleste tilfeller, men meiner det er nokon som kan takle ulike hastigheiter. trur kanskje ein av dlinks 624 eller 624 skal takle det.

 

 

mvh

JanEirik

Endret av Jankee
Lenke til kommentar

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
×
×
  • Opprett ny...