anal_fabet Skrevet 24. april 2006 Rapporter Del Skrevet 24. april 2006 (endret) Dette ble litt for off topic i en annen tråd etter min mening, så jeg lager denne tråden der folk kan fortsette å diskutere dette emnet. "Radiation plays a big part in space travel. Solar flares could have affected the astronauts at any time. The Apollo leaving Earth would travel through 2 specific areas of very high radiation called the Van Allen Belt. The first field is 272 miles out from Earth. The amount of radiation in the belts actually varies from year to year, but every 11 years its at its worst when the sunspot cycle is at its highest. And guess what? 1969 to 1970 was one of the worst times to go, as this was the time where the radiation was at its peak. I have had numerous internet chats with sceptics who say that the radiation would not play a part in the missions because Man would have not been in the radiation belt for too long. My answer to that is, when Dentists or Doctors take X ray pictures they either leave the room or stand behind a sheet of thick lead to shelter from the radiation. Why did NASA only use a small sheet of aluminium to protect the astronauts when they knew that the radiation levels in Space and on the Moon's surface would be many hundreds of times more deadly? And why would they risk their astronauts to such conditions? In 1959 Bill Kaysing was privy to a study made by the Russians. The Russians discovered that the radiation on the moon would require astronauts to be clothed in four feet of lead to avoid being killed." Edit: Link Endret 24. april 2006 av anal_fabet Lenke til kommentar
oysfaerg Skrevet 24. april 2006 Rapporter Del Skrevet 24. april 2006 Hvorfor kverulere på noe som er bevist? Tråden stenges da dette blir ett fjollete tema. Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg