Å næmmen en furtete Svenske....
Otto Jespersen forklarer det egentlig veldig greit
Jag orkar inte titta på din video, men gissar att det är en del "originella" ikea flyg skämt osv. gääääsp.
F 35 har ju varit en total flopp. så dyr att tillverka och massa problem under utvecklingen: http://www.rstreet.org/2016/02/05/after-latest-f-35-setback-time-to-consider-a-replacement/
"The F-35 is a Cold War relic designed to use stealth technology to gain superiority over all enemies, air and ground. The problem with stealth technology is that the Russians and Chinese are on track to beat it. The F-35 would then have to rely on its agility and weapons to win an encounter against an advanced enemy. But the F-35 loses simulated dogfights to older F-16s and cannot see enemies very well at beyond visual range. It is essentially a glorified F-117 stealth bomber."
"Gripen is, on the other hand, built for maneuverability. Close-coupled canards, wing-body blending, and wing shape all help increase lift during maneuvers, allowing aircraft to both achieve higher angles of attack, and to turn tighter at same angle of attack. Particularly canards create vortices that reattach air flow to the wing at high angles of attack. Aside from helping air flow over the wing, Gripen’s canards also help air flow over the body. Canard also has advantage over tail as the control surface – as center of gravity for modern aircraft is towards rear of the aircraft, usage of canard results in longer moment arm than it is case with tail. Further, Gripen has large degree of wing-body blending, and it’s wing loading is also far lower than that of F-35. While thrust-to-weight ratio is below 1 for both aircraft, Gripen has far lower drag than F-35, partly compensating for F-35s superior thrust-to-weight ratio. While F-35 achieves maximum of Mach 1,6, clean or not, Gripen can achieve speeds of over Mach 2 clean."
"Comparing F-35 and Gripen, it can be seen that while F-35 is stealthier on radar, Gripen has far lower IR and lower visual signature. Unlike F-35, it also has high maneuverability, and both aircraft have advanced avionics and multirole capability, while networked data fusion will be avaliable on Gripen NG."
Länder lägger ner planer om att köpa F 35
"Here some definitive and very worrisome indications that the EXPORT version of the American F-35 Lightning is slowly but surely becoming a NOT-WANTED item. Too expensive and delivery too far down the line. And AN alternative existing at a lower cost with not so much less capability and available NOW! The Swedish Gripen. An advanced version of the original Gripen actively being considered as the go-to in the case of smaller nations needing a more modern and suitable fighter warplane and needing one NOW! South Korea, Turkey and Holland all NOW questioning the entire F-35 acquisition program. This is a major hit and embarrassment to the Lockheed program, EXPORT seen as a major market for the warplane [F-35]."
Det är allmänt känt att det var fulspel bakom kulisserna i norges fejkade vurdering, man var redan överens med lockheed och bröt förmodligen mot norsk lag: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08OSLO670_a.html
Norge har helt oförberett avbrutit andra överenskommelser med Sverige: http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/forsvaret/forsvaret-avslutter-milliardkontrakt-paa-nytt-artilleri/a/10133570/
Och det "nordiska försvarsammarbetet man varit överens med Danmark och Sverige tidigare verkar man också helt plötsligt skrota.
Da hadde det vært opplysende om du kunne kommet med oppdaterte tall på hvor mange JAS-39 Gripen NG (EF) som er produsert og er luftdyktige pr dd?
Og i samme slengen hvor mange F-35 Lightning II som er produsert og levert ?
Fint også om du tar med oppdaterte bestillingstall på begge flytyper . Fact is life !