Gå til innhold

Metaldude

Medlemmer
  • Innlegg

    637
  • Ble med

  • Besøkte siden sist

Innlegg skrevet av Metaldude

  1. jeg sier ikke man skal skjøre beruset, men når man blir dømt av å se på din egen bil blir det for dumt.

    Du må også tenke på at du kanskje synes det er en god idé å kjøre bilen etter at du har røyka litt. Når du da sitter med tenningen i og klar til å kjøre så er det jo en mye lettere å gjøre det.

  2. Jeg kommer til å bryte fartsgrensene så lenge jeg mener de ikke henger på greip, jeg holder meg da innenfor grensen for å miste sertifikatet.

     

    Kjører du penere dersom du vet at det er kontroll? Kommer du til å holde fartsgrensen dersom det blir mer vanlig med skjulte kontroller?

     

    Er ikke sikker på hvor mange prikker du får dersom du kjører for fort, men åtte prikker er nok til at du mister lappen.

    • Liker 2
  3. Hvor ofte har du hørt om noen som har fått bot for manglende eller feil lysbruk?

     

    Det kan jeg vel ikke si at jeg har opplevd. Har uansett bare sett folk som bruker feil lys på dagtid da det er lyst ute. Så for min del så bryr jeg meg egentlig ikke. Det er vel bare for å være hjelpsom til de som glemmer å skru på de riktige lysene.

     

    PS: Er dette deg, forresten? http://www.rb.no/bil/article6682261.ece :wee:

  4.  

     

    Du kjører som et vanlig kryss, dvs du blinker til venstre i forkant og inn i rundkjøringen. Bilen bak vil skjønne at du skal til venstre før du entrer rundkjøringen.

    Hvis du ikke blinker på denne måten, men kun ut av rundkjøringen så rekker du kun et par blink før du er ute...dvs ingen poeng.

     

    Ser ikke helt problemet. Hvorfor bare ikke ha det som vane å blinke ut uansett hvor stor rundkjøringen er eller om du kjører i Rogaland eller ikke. Det er jo ikke allverdens pes.

    • Liker 4
  5. Jeg har gitt opp å varsle de for lengst om de har feil med lysene.

    Enten så skjønner de det ikke, eller så bare gir de f...

    Samme her. Altfor mange som kjører med feil lysbruk. Er håpløst å blinke på de, ingen som skjønner hva du mener. La de heller få boten. Da skal du se de husker å skru på lysene neste gang.

    • Liker 1
  6. Jeg tror på Gud fordi Han har skapt søte katter.

    Ja, du har rett.

     

    On the first day of creation,

    God created the cat.

    On the second day,

    God created man to serve the cat.

    On the third,

    God created all the animals

    of the earth to serve as potential

    food for the cat.

    On the fourth day,

    God created honest toil so that man

    could labor for the good of the cat.

    On the fifth day,

    God created the sparkle ball

    so that the cat

    might or might not play with it.

    On the sixth day,

    God created veterinary science

    to keep the cat healthy

    and the man broke.

    On the seventh day,

    God tried to rest,

    but he had to scoop the litterbox.

  7. Mange ateister nå til dags er alt for skråsikre og blåser den minste feil de finner i Bibelen opp til det ugjenkjennelige. Kan vi ikke alle bare konkludere med at vi ikke vet? Vi vet ikke, vi vet ikke, vi vet ikke. Vi tror, alle sammen, ateister som troende.

     

    Problemet er at det er altfor mange kristne som vet at de har svaret. Det jeg ville fram til er hvor latterlig bibelen er. Den mener noe, óg mener det motsatte.

  8. Diskusjon mellom en teolog (Chris) og en ateist (Norm):

     

     

     

    Have you ever noticed that when you read the Bible, it often makes no sense? For example, you can read Matthew 17:20 and Jesus clearly says, "Nothing will be impossible for you." And yet, you know for a fact that that statement is wrong. Lots of things are impossible for you.

     

    If you ask a Christian about this discrepency, the Christian will say, "Ah, you see, you are not interpretting the Bible correctly. You need to talk to a theologian. He will set you straight."

    Isn't it odd that the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, perfect creator of the universe has written a book, but he was unable to write clearly, so we need human theologians to interpret it for us? Why would a perfect god say "Nothing will be impossible for you" unless he meant "Nothing will be impossible for you?" Surely God knows how humans interpret sentences. So why didn't he speak the truth?

     

    The reason why God speaks so unclearly, and why God fails to speak the truth so often in the Bible, and the reason why we need theologians, is because God is imaginary. You can see that in the following dialog with a theologian:

     

    Norm: Hello Chris, it is nice to meet you. I understand that you are a theologian with a PhD in theology.

     

    Chris: Yes, I am a trained theologian. How may I help you?

     

    Norm: Can you answer a question for me: Does God answer prayers?

     

    Chris: Yes, certainly. He has answered hundreds of my prayers.

     

    Norm: Pray for him to put $10,000 in my pocket right now.

     

    Chris: It does not work that way. I said God answers prayers, not that he is a cosmic genie.

     

    Norm: So, in Mark 11:24, when Jesus says, "Whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours," what did he mean? That sounds like you can have whatever you pray for.

     

    Chris: He means that you pray for something, and if it is his will then you shall receive it. Jesus is under no obligation to answer any prayer. Nor is he obligated to provide the answer that you expect. There are thousands of ways for Jesus to answer a prayer indirectly.

     

    Norm: If it is his will, aren't I going to get it anyway? Why pray?

     

    Chris: Ask, and you shall receive. You have to ask...

     

    Norm: ...and then you should receive. Jesus does not say, "Ask, and you might receive if it is my will." His statement has no conditions.

     

    Chris: He meant that. It is implied. You need to see Jesus in the context of the rabbinical doctrine in the early fist century AD.

     

    Norm: OK, why does God never answer impossible prayers? For example, if I pray to fly like superman, or to restore my friends amputated limb, why will it never happen?

     

    Chris: It is not God's will. It would eliminate faith in God if God answered an impossible prayer as you are suggesting. Our God is a God of faith. That is his intention and is clearly stated throughout the Bible.

     

    Norm: So why did God part the Red Sea? Surely that took away faith.

     

    Chris: You clearly have no understanding of God's intentions or purposes in the Bible. At the time of Genesis, under Mosaic law, God's relationship with mankind was completely different than it is today.

     

    Norm: I see. So in Matthew 17:20, when Jesus says, "nothing will be impossible to you," why isn't flying-like-superman or $10,000-in-my-pocket-right-now part of that?

     

    Chris: Quite clearly you have never bothered with any sort of exegetical understanding of the Bible's promises on prayer. God is under no obligation to answer any prayer.

     

    Norm: So when Jesus uses the example of moving a mountain, which is clearly impossible, what did he mean?

     

    Chris: Jesus clearly was speaking metaphorically, as was common in the first century.

     

    Norm: So when Jesus said "anyone with faith can move a mountain," what he actually meant was, "No one with faith can move a mountain."

     

    Chris: No.

     

    Norm: Then, who can move a mountain?

     

    Chris: God can move a mountain.

     

    Norm: But he never does.

     

    Chris: It is not his will. And keep in mind that God must remain hidden.

     

    Norm: Let me make sure I have this straight. Here is what Jesus said in Matthew 17:20:

    You will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you.

     

    But here is what you think he meant:

     

    You will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you, as long as it is possible and as long as it is my will.

    Is that right?

     

    Chris: You are completely clueless, and an idiot besides. No biblical commentary, and no Christian denominational body agrees with any of your interpretations of these passages, nor do I.

     

    Norm: Answer the question. Is that what he meant?

     

    Chris: This is irrelevant to the conversation.

     

    Norm: Here's what I do not understand. What Jesus said in the Bible is obviously wrong. If God is perfect, there is no reason why God would put something that is completely wrong in the Bible. Why do we need human beings like you to interpret and massage and explain what God might have meant in the Bible? Why wouldn't an omnipotent, all-knowing, perfect God have written it the way he meant it, in an understandable, clear, unambiguous, truthful, correct way? There isn't anything vague about, "Nothing will be impossible for you" or, "Ask, and you shall receive." Yet, it is completely wrong. Explain that to me.

     

    Chris: You are completely missing the point.

     

     

    And so on...

    Most people can see the problem that is apparent in this conversation. There is no reason why an all-knowing, perfect God would write down, "you can move mountains" or, "nothing will be impossible for you" or, "Ask, and you shall receive" unless he meant that.

    Unfortunately, the reality is that no one can move mountains, and thousands of things will be impossible for you. Not even Jesus moved a mountain. In fact, not one of Jesus' supposed miracles left any evidence for us to examine today.

     

    Why would Jesus, who is supposedly the son of God, say, "Love your enemy and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven," in Matthew 5:44-45, but then say "Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be damned [to hell]" in Mark 16:16? Why doesn't Jesus love his enemies? A theologian can explain it, even though the explanation makes absolutely no sense.

     

    Why does the Bible tell us that we need to murder half of the citizens of the United States? A theologian can explain it, even though the explanation makes absolutely no sense.

    Why is God a complete sexist in the Bible, and a champion of slavery? A theologian can explain it, even though the explanation makes absolutely no sense.

     

    Why would an omniscient God write a creation story in the Bible that is acknowleged to be complete nonsense by tens of thousands of clergy members? A theologian can explain it, even though the explanation makes absolutely no sense.

     

    The reason why you can't read the Bible yourself, and the reason why only "trained theologians" can "interpret" a book written by God, and the reason why the Bible is actually, concretely incorrect in so many places (despite any interpretation) is because God is imaginary. If God were real, and if God had actually written a book, the book would be brilliant and inspiring. The book would say things that are actually true. Prayer would work as it is actually described by the Bible. People would be left in awe by what they read the Bible. That is what "being perfect" is all about.

     

  9. Nå er det også nesten en måned til neste kjøretime, så det virker ikke som jeg blir prioritert noe særlig.

     

    Det er nok fordi det er sommer. Mange fler som velger å ta lappen i denne sesongen. Jeg startet selv på lappen i november måned og fikk time hver uke, noen ganger to ganger i uken. Læreren min satte meg også tidlig opp til oppkjøring, så det ikke skulle bli så lang tid fra jeg av ferdig med kjøringen til oppkjøring.

×
×
  • Opprett ny...