Gå til innhold

eriaur

Medlemmer
 Vis profil  Se deres aktivitet

  • Innlegg

    29

  • Ble med

  • Besøkte siden sist

 Innholdstype 

Innlegg skrevet av eriaur

  7. Dell har avslørt sin nye, massive 4K-skjerm

    i Diskuter dataartikler (Tek.no)

    Skrevet · Endret av eriaur

    Pressemeldingen

    Dell UltraSharp 32 monitor with Ultra HD resolution

     

    Dell's largest and highest resolution UltraSharp monitor, Dell UltraSharp 32 with Ultra HD, features phenomenal front of screen performance, high pixel density and is optimized for Dell Precision workstations. Designed for media & entertainment professionals doing color critical work including film & video editors, animators, game and app developers, modelers and programmers – Dell UltraSharp 32 monitor with Ultra HD resolution gives you:

     

    · A screen as big as your imagination and exceptional Ultra HD 3840x2160 resolution

    · High performance display featuring cutting-edge IGZO screen technology

    · Wide color gamut with 1.07 billion colors – more than 64 times more colors than standard monitors (1.07 billion vs 16.7 million colors)

    · Total color control via the included Dell UltraSharp Color Calibration Solution software, including hardware LUT access.

    ·Available in the fourth quarter of 2013

    Ultra-HD TV:

    http://www.flatpanel...l&id=1350892422 4K skal nå hete Ultra-HD, nye krav

    http://en.wikipedia....tion_television Ultra-HD wiki

  8. Superoppløsningen får TV-markedet til å vokse igjen

    i Diskuter dataartikler (Tek.no)

    Skrevet · Endret av eriaur

    Ultra-HD Blu-ray neste år?

     

    Ron Jones` (fra avsforum/projectorreviews) blog:

     

    On the Road to 4K UHD

    http://www.projector...-to-4k-uhd.html

     

    "Thus the bottom line we should take from all of this is that it now seems possible, perhaps likely, that there will be consumer products coming to the marketplace by the end of 2014 that support a new version of Blu-ray Discs with native 4K resolution and the other UHD improvements."

     

    4K Ultra-HD Video Sources – Status Report

    http://www.projector...tus-report.html

  13. 3D er døende

    i Diskuter artikler (Teknofil.no)

    Skrevet

    4K er mye større og viktigere.
    4K er bortkastet tull til film, kun hensiktsmessig ved stillbilder og tilnærmet stillbilder siden bevegelser visker ut detaljer når antall bilder per sekund er så lavt som 30. Selv på full HD legger 30 bps en stor begrensning på detaljnivået på bevegelige bilder.

     

    Ser den. Edit: 4K er potensielt mye større og viktigere. Først og fremst på kino som vanlig.

  14. 3D er døende

    i Diskuter artikler (Teknofil.no)

    Skrevet · Endret av eriaur

    Med 4K oppløsning trenger man ikke de slitsomme aktiv flimmer brillene lenger.

    Passive 3D, employed by this Sony and its LG counterpart, is inherently more comfortable and enjoyable to watch than active 3D. Unfortunately, until 4K came along, passive 3D TVs were limited to half the vertical resolution of 1080p (1,920x540 pixels), which caused artifacts and visible line structure in some scenes. The extra pixels of 4K allow the TVs to overcome that limitation, delivering higher than 1080p resolution (3,840x1,080 pixels) per eye.

     

    The XBR-84X900 creates the best 3D image I've seen on a flat-panel TV. Watching my favorite 3D test, "Hugo," I saw all of the benefits of passive and none of those artifacts. Line structure in areas where I'd noticed it before, like the edges of Hugo's face (13:33) and of Isabel's (17:06), was nonexistent. The same went for moving lines I'd seen on other passive sets (typically when the camera moved over a scene that contained a horizontal edge at a shallow angle), like the bowler hat of Uncle Claude (22:41) and the edge of a low wall outside the station (22:09). I didn't note the exact seating distance when line structure did become visible, but even from 5 feet (a sickening distance with 3D on a TV this large), I didn't see any.

     

    Meanwhile, the ghostly double images of cross-talk -- for example, in Hugo's hand as it reached for the mouse (5:01) and the tuning pegs on the guitar (7:49) -- were as absent as I'd expect from any passive set. The image was also plenty bright.

     

    Sony XBR-84X900 - Flat-panel TVs - CNET Reviews

  15. 3D er døende

    i Diskuter artikler (Teknofil.no)

    Skrevet · Endret av eriaur

    Jeg har bare sett 3D på MIB3 på kino. Angret etterpå at jeg valgt 3D fordi effekten var forstyrrende og dermed hindret innlevelse.

    Det er ikke 3D, men en 2D film konvertert til en mellomting av 2D og 3D.

     

    Jeg synes man burde fortsette å satse på 3D. men jeg synes at 4K er viktigere

    4K er mye større og viktigere. 3D er stort sett animasjonsfilmer pluss en og annen konvertert superheltfilm.

  23. 3D-TV har dabbet helt av

    i Diskuter dataartikler (Tek.no)

    Skrevet

    Jeg har markedets beste 3D tv, Panasonic 65VT50 og det er langt ifra ræva for å si det mildt. LG sine er jo litt mer behagelig med sin passive teknologi men en får liksom ikke det samme "punchet" i bildet.

    Blir spennende å se hvordan de kommende 4K TVene er på 3D.

    http://reviews.cnet....7-35431618.html

    Passive 3D, employed by this Sony and its LG counterpart, is inherently more comfortable and enjoyable to watch than active 3D. Unfortunately, until 4K came along, passive 3D TVs were limited to half the vertical resolution of 1080p (1,920x540 pixels), which caused artifacts and visible line structure in some scenes. The extra pixels of 4K allow the TVs to overcome that limitation, delivering higher than 1080p resolution (3,840x1,080 pixels) per eye.

     

    The XBR-84X900 creates the best 3D image I've seen on a flat-panel TV. Watching my favorite 3D test, "Hugo," I saw all of the benefits of passive and none of those artifacts. Line structure in areas where I'd noticed it before, like the edges of Hugo's face (13:33) and of Isabel's (17:06), was nonexistent. The same went for moving lines I'd seen on other passive sets (typically when the camera moved over a scene that contained a horizontal edge at a shallow angle), like the bowler hat of Uncle Claude (22:41) and the edge of a low wall outside the station (22:09). I didn't note the exact seating distance when line structure did become visible, but even from 5 feet (a sickening distance with 3D on a TV this large), I didn't see any.

     

    Meanwhile, the ghostly double images of cross-talk -- for example, in Hugo's hand as it reached for the mouse (5:01) and the tuning pegs on the guitar (7:49) -- were as absent as I'd expect from any passive set. The image was also plenty bright.

×
×
  • Opprett ny...