Gå til innhold

enola117

Medlemmer
  • Innlegg

    79
  • Ble med

  • Besøkte siden sist

Innlegg skrevet av enola117

  1. For the 1st question, look back in time (the 19th and 20th centuaries) and you will understand what I was talking about.

     

    And the vote staf maybe it realy works here, but not in my country. The politicians there are all the same and no mather what or who you vote, it won't do any help at all. That's why Romania is still a "developing" country.

    If you buy products from developing countries you should know that you won't help it's people, but just a bunch of local barons that will become just stronger and that are only looking for the profit and not for the people. I've lived in such a country so you can trust my words.

    Travel in developing countries as a tourist generatic jobs. Good advice, and what kind of jobs you generate when you travel? The ones in tourism?

     

    You have to understand that what you propouse it's just as bad as the indiference. You vote, leting others to "help" in your place, you eat saying that eating is helping people that don't have anything at all to eat, and you travel. That's alot of helping, slow down a bit! Oh man... you are truly unbeliaveble.

  2. Helping someone to know more about the world, to educate him, to show him the beauty of art and knowledge it can possibly mean to "deastroy a country", but on the countrary.
    Please tell that to the people of Zimbabwe.

    2nd: Oh, and please read this part too:

     

    "No one tells you to teach them something that will eventually and inevitably destroy ones culture and tradition (like it happened here with sami for exemple), but to make him aware of the importance of it's legacy and to make him to be proud he was born there" or you read only what you want to see and only what you think you can combate?

  3. Helping someone to know more about the world, to educate him, to show him the beauty of art and knowledge it can possibly mean to "deastroy a country", but on the countrary.
    Please tell that to the people of Zimbabwe.

     

    1st of all: I don't have the time nor the will to explain it to you. Those didnt wanted to help, but to exploy or to convert them to some kind of religion. Do you see the difference betwen teaching and exploiting? This happened not only to Zimbabwe but to most of the African, South Est Asia and South America countries. They didn't helped the natives at all, the only took advantage of them under the pretext of "helping". They made them slaves, this is the truth.

    But I believe you are able to see the difference. Do you thing the guy here want's to take advantage of them? Wants to make them slaves?

    Now explain me how this guy will, (by teaching for example literature and geography, by taking some kids to walk in the beautiful landscapes of Romania) destoy a country? I live under the impresion that you aren't informed at all and you try to justify you indiference by saying "I won't help because that's a bad thing. Insted I sit here and contemplate how much good I do to this world by doing nothing" Good luck with that.

  4. It may not be much (at least in Samuro's opinion) but for those kids it will be all.
    Yes, you can help a few kids for a short time, but duing so you are going to hurt the entire country for a long time.

     

    If you are naive and have no concience I will not be able to stop you from destroying the country.

     

    http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bj%C3%B8rnetjeneste

     

    Helping someone to know more about the world, to educate him, to show him the beauty of art and knowledge it can possibly mean to "deastroy a country", but on the countrary. As Plato 1st said, and then resaid by so many great and wise brain of this human race using different words, like Cioran, Plotin, Epicur etc, "evil comes from indiference".

    What you are saying here is that education not only that doesn't help at all, but creates monsters. But if you can just for a moment look to the world outside you will see that is the other way around. All those romanians (gipsies) that come here in Norway and steal and murder and whatever aren't educated at all! Most of them are completly illiterate. The do what they do because they lack education. I dunno how you could come up with such think, many you like to contradict, maybe you didn't gave it to many thoughts, but I can't accept and believe that someone can think in this way.

    No one tells you to teach them something that will eventually and inevitably destroy ones culture and tradition (like it happened here with sami for exemple), but to make him aware of the importance of it's legacy and to make him to be proud he was born there.

  5. I have some friends living in India (some of them are europeans) and they say it's a very cheap country. They usualy make around 200 us dollars per month so they have to live with that (including rent, food, transportation, excursion etc). So, for 5 month I think you can do it with around 2-5000 euros (including long trips to other countries, like the ones you are planning to do).

  6. Depends on how long you wanna stay in a location, if you want to travell alot, susing an interrail or something, if you're interested in historical places, what precisely would you expect to see and do etc. Althrough on an Earth's map Europe looks quite small, you won't be able to see it in one summer or one year, not ever in couple of years, so please be more precise.

  7. Probably the best way you can help anyone is to get involved, to make others realise in what world their are living in, and perhaps, on a small scale, you have already begun doing that. It is very true that volunteer work in poor country doesn't realy help much, expecialy when we are speacking of the country itself, but it does help the individuals. And this is the most important think. You can not start from the top and the make your way down, but the other way around. And any help is important, expecialy when you are there. I don't know if you consider or not Romania being a country of the 3rd world, but it preaty much is. And there to you can help, althrough not by building orphanages, but by helping the ones in there, being with them, telling stories to the kids, taking them on trips, teaching etc. It may not be much (at least in Samuro's opinion) but for those kids it will be all.

  8. hva er den hurtigste og billingste måten å komme seg til sverige.... nermere bestemt hjö

     

    Can you give me a link where I can buy/book a seat on a train Oslo - Stockholm at this price? On nsb it doesnt say anything about this train, it only gives you a link to an outside site and the price is way more expensive then 99kr.

  9. Du sier du vil slå deg løs, men du har hverken lyst til å feste eller drikke... Hva i huleste er det du da setter i å slå deg løs?

     

    Og skal gi deg et hint.... jenter liker gutter som det er litt liv i. Ta med ei kasse på neste fest og slå på stortromma, så lenge du ikke prøver å voldta noen kan du alltids skylde på fylla hvis det går galt.

     

    Powerpie, you are very superficial. You think that you own some standards and that the whole world must fit into your judgment? Take a look around you! You are just a product of your society, nothing more.

     

     

    And regarding the subject. there is nothing wrong with you, it doesn't mather if you are a virgin or not, if you drink beer or not. Just be how you want to be, not how the society or anyone else expects you to be, and stop thinking that you are in some kind of disadvantage or on a wrong track. There is no such thing as "normaly" other then what the majority dictates.

  10. En stk langstilka rose er en vinner til noe sånt! :) Ikke så vanvittig dyrt, men veldig romantisk!

     

    Men husk, det kan hende du kommer inn i en slags sirkel hvor hun forventer at du kjøper noe til henne om du fortsetter med dette!

     

    Hun er ikke for ung da til å gi henne en rose?

     

    It's just a token of your afection and apreciation, her age doesn't mather when you give her a rose.

  11. With that kind of money you can take her for a dinner in Paris, flying from Rygge with Ryanair :)

     

    Nevertheless, it's up to you to decide how mush she's worthing for you. But I think it will be much better if you would take her out, at a restaurant or to a picnic, or just for a walk. You can buy her some roses, just to show your apreciation and the fact that you remembered. Nothing fancy, just be yourself.

  12. ...but if you're looking for a relationship based on friendship and understanding, the sex is rather unimportant.

    And of course, with the time, as your needs will slowly decrease, you won't long for sex as much as you used to do. It's all about hormons.

     

    Hormonene til kvinner tilsier at sexlysten øker frem til høydepunktet.

     

    Og, hva med lidenskapen i et forhold? Joda, vennskap og forståelse er viktig, men lidenskapen bør også være på plass. Ellers er man bare kompiser som bor sammen. Noe som sikkert går bra for mange, og som jeg også var fornøyd med en stund, men er det da den rette...?

     

    Passion is normal in the early stages (most poweful in the first months), but then, afther a while it will eventualy decrease. What would you do then? Find another one to feel the same passion as you once did? Many youngs confuse passion with love and believe that when passion's gone they don't love that person anymore.

    The sex is normal and nice, but on it's own it can't keep a relationship working. You can have sex with a inflatable doll or whatever, but you can't trust a doll, you can't speach with it, it can't provides you anything but sex.

    I'm not against sex, no way! I'm just not agreeing with the fact that sex is 90% important in a relationship, or even 50% or 30%.

  13. It is really a sad thing, but enola117 is the only carrier of truth here.

     

    Det at man på død og liv må ha sex for at et forhold skal fungere er bare tull og tøys. Det er imidlertid viktigere når man er ung og hormonene raser (slik som enola117 uttaler det), men etterhvert som man blir eldre blir både sexlysten og viktigheten av sex mindre.

    Hos noen (når man er yngre i et parforhold) så er det nok slik at sex er en god del av limet som holder forholdet igang. Ettersom man blir eldre så erfarer man at det er helt andre ting enn sex som er viktig for at forholdet overlever.

    Believe me - dere vil selv se det når dere nærmer dere 50....:-)

     

    Det er vel heller ikke ingen sex/sex som er temaet her..? Men om man har god sex eller dårlig sex? Forhold uten sex er da bare å være venner under samme tak. Så for å diskutere det burde vel saken være om venner som bor sammen burde ha sex eller ikke..

     

    Jeg vet om flere kvinner på over 50 som er skuffet over at sexen er borte, hvor det er mannen som mener det er helt greit at den ikke er der. Mange kvinner får også en seksuell opptur etter overgangsalderen på grunn av at man slipper alle bekymringer om graviditet og prevensjon.

     

    Selv om man er tilfreds med situasjonen man er i med ingen eller dårlig sex, så hadde det vel vært bedre med ett fantastisk sexliv i tillegg.

     

    Kviner usualy reach their sexual maturity rather late reporting to the males, so it's a fact that the desire apears and deseapers more quickly on male then female, so is normal for a woman to wanna have sex afther the menopause.

    I've only said that, for me!, sex is rather unimportant, I didn't said I don't have sex or anything like that.

  14. Hvordan skal jeg oppføre meg når jeg møter henne i morgen? Begge gruer seg litt, siden det blir kleint og alt det der, men skal jeg liksom oppføre meg som jeg kjenner henne osv?

    kanskje litt dumt spørsmål men^^

     

    Act like you know eachother.

    Invite her at a soda or a coffe or just take her for a walk later, but whatever you do, don't pretend you don't know her.

  15. Yes, I may say you are quite right... The thing is that laws are made by rich people that do not need social health care. What should they care then? They are only trying to persuate their citezens that those rules are needed or in conformity with the laws of nature. In this way they wont raise their own population against them. They call this "democracy", but I think that a better word is "plutocracy". In my opinion you can't be rich (and not helping the others by any meanings that you can) and religious in the same time. Jisus said "And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God." (Mathew 19.24)

×
×
  • Opprett ny...