Gå til innhold

Dokumentarer på nett. Les regler første post.


Anbefalte innlegg

  • 5 måneder senere...
Videoannonse
Annonse
  • 3 uker senere...

Once upon a time in Norway (2008)

Sjanger: Musikk - Black metal

Karakter: 7/10

Kommentar: Lite kreativ dokumentar - må være interessert i black metal historie for at du skal finne denne dokumentaren interessant, eller ha en interesse for norsk historie

 

Del 1 -

Del 2 -

Del 3 -

Del 4 -

Del 5 -

Del 6 -

Del 7 -

 

Satan rir media (1998)

Sjanger: Musikk - Black metal

Karakter: 8/10

Kommentar: Mye det samme som den over. Denne er litt mer interessant for folk generelt.

 

Del 1 -

Del 2 -

Del 3 -

Del 4 -

Del 5 -

Del 6 -

 

Jeg anbefaler å putte &fmt=18 bak youtube adressen, det vil øke kvaliteten på filmene.

Endret av Insense
Lenke til kommentar
  • 1 måned senere...
  • 2 måneder senere...
Tenkte jeg kunne lage en tråd hvor vi poster anbefalinger av dokumentarer, gjerne med youtube clip hvis det er tilgjengelig.

 

Vil helst at vi holder det til teknologi og vitenskap, har ingenting imot richard dawkins og hans brennende entusiasme for evolusjonær lære, men føler at det ikke handler så mye om uutforket territorie, men mer om politisk motiverende retorikk.

 

Det samme går for zeitgeist, ghosthunters o.l. Dere er selvfølgelig fri til å poste hva dere vil, men jeg håper og tror dere er enige i at f.eks utvikling innen robotikk og sånt er mere spennende. :-)

 

Oh, og ingen kommentarer! Kun poster med innhold i nevnte format. Tenk på at vi skal kunne søke frem til disse på en grei måte i internettbutikken, så riktig tittel er et must.

 

Siden jeg er førstis, er jeg faktisk førstis! >__<

 

 

Tittel: BBC Horizon - Time Travel (2003)

 

 

Beskrivelse: Kjempefin episode om tidsreiser. Liker spesielt denne siden den beskriver utviklingen av menneskets syn på tid fra newtons teorier til einsteins special relativity og alle dets grener. Veldig reflektivt og tankeprovoserende.

 

Temaer:

 

Einstein - Special Relativity

Tidsmaskiner - Spinning Cylinders, Cosmic Strings, Wormholes

 

 

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZneTJlByTc

Lenke til kommentar
  • 1 måned senere...
  • 1 måned senere...
  • 1 måned senere...
  • 4 uker senere...
  • 2 uker senere...

Denne er veldig bra, og åpner sinnet ditt ganske mye. Er 15 deler.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSk51Lp-vHU

Fra hva jeg har forstått er mye av What the bleep do we know kjent som pseudovitenskap, new age tull, løgner og manipulerende. Så vær veldig forsiktig. Folk som Lawrence Krauss, James Randi og Richard Dawkins har i hvert fall vært kritisk til den.

 

 

Hehe filmen er faktisk kjent som "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ" :D

Lenke til kommentar
  • 2 uker senere...

hei

 

en dokumentar jeg vil anbefale på det sterkeste er "Promise". Den handler om israelske og palestinske barn, og om hvordan de opplever konfliktene i Midtøsten. Det er kanskje ikke en dokumentar man vil se dersom man vil ha masse årstall og 'harde fakta', men jeg synes barnas stemme er et viktig bidrag. I dokumentaren møtes palestinske og israelske barna hverandre og folka bak dokumentaren har også fulgt opp barna som var med videre. veldig interessant, har desverre ikke en link til selve dokumentaren, men den lå på nettet da jeg så den (en stund siden dog). Nettsida er: http://www.promisesproject.org/

Lenke til kommentar
  • 1 måned senere...

"RFK Must Die: The Assassination of Bobby Kennedy

 

A new investigative documentary exploring the controversies surrounding the assassination of Bobby Kennedy on June 5, 1968 as he looked set to challenge Nixon for the White House. Munir Sirhan tells how his brother Sirhan has never been able to remember the shooting. Sandra Serrano speaks for the first time in forty years about the girl in the polka-dot dress fleeing the scene, yelling "We shot him! We shot him!" And Dr. Herbert Spiegel of Columbia University describes how Sirhan was hypnotically programmed to kill Robert Kennedy."

 

Se den her :

 

http://www.documentary-log.com/you-are-watching-rfk-must-die-the-assassination-of-bobby-kennedy/

 

( Fire deler. Første tjue minutter forteller forhistorien. Deretter kommer vi fram til drapet på Robert F. Kennedy. )

Endret av Kubin
Lenke til kommentar
  • 1 måned senere...

Anbefaler "Water, the great mystery"... ganske bra dokumentar...

 

http://www.documentary-log.com/d1301-water-the-great-mystery/

 

Can water remember?

 

The much-anticipated documentary Water – The Great Mystery, from the creators of What the Bleep Do We Know?, has just been released in South Africa.

The blockbuster made waves in the UK and US earlier this year, and is centred on the theme of so-called "water memory" – a controversial theory which proposes that water responds to our thoughts and, through this mechanism, has a profound effect on our health.

 

The launch coincided with the South African tour of Japanese researcher Dr Masaru Emoto, author of the New York Times best-seller Hidden Messages of Water, who believes water is deeply connected to our individual and collective consciousness.

 

Do we really know all there is to know about water? Are these theories as far-fetched as they seem to be? Take a look at some of the theories proposed in the documentary – then you decide:

 

Water – The Great Mystery

Scientists worldwide agree: water is unique and without it life on Earth simply wouldn't be possible.

 

H2O is a particularly interesting molecule in the sense that it makes up the only substance on the planet that can exist in three states – solid, liquid and gas. Water has the highest surface tension of all liquids, it's the most powerful solvent on Earth and has the remarkable ability to rise up through the trunks of massive trees, defying gravity and immense atmospheric pressure in the process.

 

This much is made clear in the introduction of Water – The Great Mystery.

 

The documentary features several scientists from around the world who've researched water. The impressive list includes, among others, Prof Kurt Wüthrich, Swiss chemist and Nobel Chemistry laureate, Prof Rustum Roy from the State University of Pennsylvania and member of the International Academy of Science, Prof Vladimir Voeikov, a biologist from the Moscow State University, Prof Konstantin Korotkov, a physicist of St. Petersburg State Technical University in Russia, and Dr Emoto, who is also President Emeritus of the International Water for Life Foundation.

 

Interesting theories are proposed:

 

1. It's noted that water receives and makes an "imprint" of any outside influence, "remembering" everything that occurs in the space that surrounds it. Research seems to indicate that any substance coming into contact with water leaves a trace behind (incidentally, this theory is also central to homeopathy).

 

2. It's further noted that, as water records information, it acquires new properties, yet its chemical composition remains unchanged. It seems that the structure of water – i.e. how its molecules are organised into clusters – is key to the remarkable properties that are proposed. It's hypothesised that the clusters work as "memory cells", in which water records the history of its relationship with the world.

 

3. Its proposed that, while water remains water, its structure reacts to "irritation". It's noted that "modern instruments have made it possible to record that within each of water's memory cells, there are 440 000 information panels, each of which is responsible for its own type of interaction with the environment."

 

4. Brief mention is made of the difference between free-flowing water in nature and the water that's distributed to our homes through intricate water-supply systems – i.e. the water we most often come into contact with. It's suggested that our tap water is basically "dead" in structural terms: when crystals are formed from this water, there's no beauty or symmetry. Austrian researcher Allois Gruber suggests that this water "sucks energy out of people, plants and animals".

 

5. Scientists quoted in the movie claim that water responds to our thoughts. As our bodies are mostly made up of water, it's said that if the water in our cells can become peaceful, so can we.

 

6. Mention is made of experiments on the effect that diverse factors, such as magnetic and electrical fields, various objects and human emotions, have on samples of water. According to Prof Konstantin Korotkov, there seems to be evidence that positive and negative human emotions have the strongest influence. When study participants were asked to project emotions onto flasks with water, negative emotions (e.g. fear, aggression and hatred) reduced the energy of the sample water, whereas positive emotions (e.g. love, tenderness and concern) increased the water's energy levels.

 

7. This theory is expanded with reference to experiments conducted by Dr Emoto. His research seems to show that water reacts positively to words such as "love" and "gratitude" by forming beautiful crystals when frozen in a cryogenic chamber. The opposite seems to be true for a phrase such as "You disgust me". Water also seems to react to prayer and music.

 

What's your opinion?

We're amazed. If some of these theories are even just partly true, it certainly turns our understanding of the physics of water on its head.

 

But although the theories are laid forward by some heavyweight scientists, there are many other experts around the world who are extremely sceptical about the concept of water memory, branding it as "pseudoscience".

 

For example, research done years ago by French scientist Jacques Benveniste has been widely discredited. The researcher made headlines when his work on water memory was published in the reputable journal Nature in 1988. His research seemed to show that water that had been in contact with an allergenic substance retained a memory of this substance even after it was diluted several times (so much so that nothing but pure water was left).

 

However, efforts to replicate his work proved futile and investigators found that the results obtained from Benveniste's laboratory were unreliable. John Maddox, editor of Nature, conducted the investigation himself and, according to the BBC, later stated that Benveniste's assistants were being subconsciously selective in the way they interpreted the data.

 

Regarding more recent work, only one article on Dr Emoto's controversial theory that human emotion has an effect on the structure of water has appeared in a peer-reviewed journal. This is an indication that Dr Emoto's theories at least (on which a large part of the documentary is built) can't be accepted as truth at this stage. More research simply has to be done. Dr Emoto has also been criticised for the fact that he too seems to be doing selective sampling.

 

It's furthermore worth noting that many opportunists have jumped on the bandwagon, and have started marketing products made from "structured" or "clustered" water as a cure for a range of ills and an antidote to ageing. To our knowledge, however, no substantial research has been done on the efficacy of these products, which means that they could very well be a waste of money.

 

Health24 will be following the controversy and will, in time, also conduct interviews with some of the other experts quoted in the Water documentary. In the meantime, we'd like to hear from you: post your comments below and let us know what you think!

 

- (Carine van Rooyen, Health24, September 2008)

 

 

Dette er med andre ord mer en reklamefilm for en gjeng psuedoscientister. Jeg stoler ikke i det hele tatt på innholdet i videoen.

Lenke til kommentar
  • 1 måned senere...

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
  • Hvem er aktive   0 medlemmer

    • Ingen innloggede medlemmer aktive
×
×
  • Opprett ny...